Legal Opinion
Watson v. Beabout
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 10 opinions
APPEAL from the Rush Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
The appellee, who was the plaintiff, brought this action against James B. Watson and Hayden P. Watson, upon a written agreement in these words, viz:
“Agreement between James B. Watson and William J. Beabout: The said Beabout agrees to commence labor for the said Watson on the 1st of March, 1858, and continue to work at the farming business for said Watson until the 1st of September then next following. The said Watson agrees to pay the said Beabout 15 dollars per month for the labor so performed. Also, to board, wash and mend for said Beabout during the time above mentioned. The said Watson is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burnham v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by10 opinions
- Furst & Bradley Manufacturing Co. v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Nading v. McGregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Ward v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Frash v. PolkIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Metzger v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.