Legal Opinion
Romo v. Reyes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 4, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2169PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
Petitioner seeks to have us vacate an order of the respondent court denying his motion to amend his answer to the complaint to allege the statute of limitations. Since the order is not appealable and petitioner has no adequate remedy at law, we accept jurisdiction.
The applicable facts are not in dispute. Petitioner Romo is the defendant in an action filed by respondent Reyes presently pending in Cochise County Superior Court. The litigation is the result of an automobile accident which occurred on July 4, 1973, at which time Reyes was riding as a passenger in a vehicle…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen Williams B/n/f Louise J. Smyre v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Mabel Groninger v. Merrill E. DavisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Sanders v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Cagle v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Transamerica Insurance v. TroutCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Prough v. Edinger, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Sirek v. Fairfield Snowbowl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.