Meteor Products Co. v. Société d'Electro-Chemie et d'Electro-Métallurgie
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
This action of contract against a corporation which did no business in the Commonwealth was begun by trustee process. No service was made on the principal defendant. The trustee, the Central Railway Signal Company, answered that it had funds, and thereupon Charles Hardy, Inc. and the Associated Metals and Minerals Corporation appeared as claimants. The first bill of exceptions is by these claimants. The second bill of exceptions relates to exceptions taken by the defendant. The third bill has reference to the trial on the merits. The fourth bill concerns the allowance of the motion charging…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KozlowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Cheshire National Bank v. JaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Dean v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Gahn v. LearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- National Shawmut Bank v. City of WatervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Northeastern Malden Barrel Co. Inc. v. BinderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Bank of Boston v. HauflerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.