Legal Opinion

Ravndal v. Northfork Placers

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1939No. 6666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J. —

Respondents own and farm a strip of about 25 acres of land along the Northfork River, Lemhi county, raising mostly hay and grain, using water taken from the river for irrigation. Appellant lessee of the Sundown Placer Mines, situated on the west side of the Northfork River some five miles above respondents’ land uses the hydraulic system for the recovery of gold from its placer holdings. Appellant takes water from the river uses it in its hydraulic process or “Giants,” washing the silt, sand and gravel, extracting the gold and returning the water and the remainder to the river.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Pennsylvania R. R. v. Sagamore Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Watson v. Colusa-Parrot Mining & Smelting Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Salstrom v. Orleans Bar Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieArizona Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campion v. SimpsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Campion v. SimpsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API