Houchins v. KQED, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Stevens,
with whom Mr. Justice, Brennan and Mr. Justice Powell join, dissenting.
The Court holds that the scope of press access to the Santa Rita jail required by the preliminary injunction issued against petitioner is inconsistent with the holding in Pell v. Procunier, 417 U. S. 817, 834, that “newsmen have no constitutional right of access to prisons or their inmates beyond that afforded the general public” and therefore the injunction was an abuse of the District Court’s discretion. I respectfully disagree.
Respondent KQED, Inc., has televised a number of programs about prison…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.