Legal Opinion
Beskind v. Easley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 8, 2003No. 02-1432PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge TRAXLER joined.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs, a California winery and individual oenophiles, commenced this action challenging the constitutionality of North Carolina’s Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”) laws as they apply to the direct shipment of wine to consumers, which prohibit the importation of wine into North Carolina except through a highly regulatéd three-tiered structure. The plaintiffs alleged that portions of these laws, even…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brooks v. VassarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Jelovsek v. BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Alabama Alcohol. Bev. Bd. v. Henri-Duval WinerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Hauk v. LVNV FUNDING, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Beskind v. EasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.