Potomac Electric Power Co. v. California Union Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
Since the Fall of 1989, the parties have besieged this Court with six motions to compel. Currently ripe are the last five, four of which require resolution on the merits. Given the deluge of related pleadings we have received, we are tempted to leave the parties to their own resources. Nevertheless, we now address the remaining motions at some length, with the expectation that our discourse will discourage another flood of papers in connection with motions for reconsideration.1
1. Pepco’s Motions to Compel Against Wausau, First State, and National Union
Pepeo,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Byers v. BurlesonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- In re Multi-Piece Rim Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc. v. International InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Gottlieb v. WilesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Chase Resorts, Inc. v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- PECO Energy Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.