Legal Opinion
Golz v. Shinseki
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 4, 2010No. 2009-7039PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Julius J. Golz appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) affirming the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) denying his claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Because the Veterans Court properly interpreted 38 U.S.C. § 5103A and 38 C.F.R. § 3.159(c), we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Golz served on active duty in the U.S. Navy as an aviation ordinanceman from February 1969 to November 1972. Service medical records do not show any complaints of or treatment for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Quartuccio v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Murincsak v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- McGee v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Frank A. Glover, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Sullivan v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Arzio v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Euzebio v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Kisor v. ShulkinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Cook v. SnyderUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2017
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.