Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1977No. 53920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. The appellants were indicted for selling "a quantity of hydromorphone.” A chemist employed by the state crime lab testified that the samples he received tested positive for the presence of hydromorphone. He further testified that the pills in evidence were also known by the proprietary name of Dilaudid; he did not test the substance to determine if it was hydromorphone in its pure state but it was his belief the pills were "some sort of salt” of hydromorphone, probably hydromorphone hydrochloride, consisting of hydromorphone (the "base”) and chlorine. A defense…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Palma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Dobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Loder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SobelSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Mann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Rick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API