Legal Opinion

Rick v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1979No. 58484PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the offenses of possession of Pethidine and attempting to obtain Pethidine by forgery. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. Since defendant has offered no argument or citation of authority to support his contention of error in the admission of certain evidence, this enumeration of error is deemed abandoned under Rule 15 (c) (2) of this court’s rules (Code Ann. § 24-3615 (c) (2), F.L. Code Ann. § 24-3618 (c) (2)). See also Brooks v. State, 141 Ga. App. 725, 730 (234 SE2d 541).

2. Appellant does not contest the trial court’s determination that his motion to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. High v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Elder v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Murray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Poss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Tisdol v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API