Legal Opinion

Silurian Oil Co. v. Neal

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1917No. 10983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lawrence county; the Hon. J. C. EaglETOn, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

On June 8, 1906, W. E. Neal (his wife, Dora Neal, joining with him,) leased a tract of land in Lawrence county to G. T. Braden for the purpose of mining and operating for oil. The rental was provided for by what was called a royalty, as follows: “In consideration of the premises the said party of the second part covenant and agree, first, to deliver to the credit of the first parties, free of cost in the pipe line to which the party of the second part may connect his wells, a part of all oil produced and saved from the leased premises, to be determined as follows: One-eighth when the average…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sarah v. ReadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Sutherland v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Purvines v. HarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hawley v. SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Mills v. LockwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bernard Bros., Inc. v. DeiblerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  2. Hennepin Paper Co. v. Fort Wayne Corrugated Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  3. Pernod v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. BernnardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Strutzel v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API