Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Germain v. Raad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 30, 1937PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are cross actions in contract begun in the Superior Court. Germain seasonably filed in each case a claim for trial by jury. The cases were referred to an auditor. There is now no controversy concerning his report. After the filing of the auditor’s report, which covered both cases, Germain filed in each case an insistence upon his right to trial by jury and reservation of the right at such trial to introduce further evidence upon all material issues. Raad filed in each action a motion that the case be advanced for speedy trial. Those motions were allowed on June 10, 1935. The docket…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. PingaroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Coonce v. CoonceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Aaron v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API