Legal Opinion
Inamed Corp. v. Medmarc Casualty Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 4, 2002No. 00-11325 ABC(MANx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendant Medmarc Casualty Insurance Company ("Defendant” or “Medmarc”) filed the above-referenced motion for summary judgment on September 23, 2002. The motion came on for hearing before this Court on November 4, 2002. After considering the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel and the case file, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The instant suit arises out of a number of bodily injury claims filed against Plaintiffs Inamed Corporation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodman v. Safeway Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- In re Daewoo Motor America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Jacobson v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Seaton Insurance v. Yosemite InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010