Legal Opinion

Crittenton v. Reed

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 22, 1996No. 78523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Judge.

Crittenton, a not-for-profit corporation, seeks refund of real estate taxes paid to Kansas City. After the circuit court rejected its various arguments, Crittenton appealed to this Court. Mo. Const. art. V, § 3. Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded.

I

In 1986, Kansas City voters approved Charter Section 62 authorizing the city council to levy by annual ordinance a “special assessment,” not to exceed $1 per foot on land abutting the boulevards, parkways, roads and other highways under control of the board of park commissioners. On the board’s recommendation, the council…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. City of St. Louis ex rel. Seibert v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. City of St. Louis v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. Hatfield v. McCluneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eisel v. Midwest BankCentreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Fisher v. State Highway Com'n of Mo.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. State v. Entertainment Ventures I, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Skaggs v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. City of Columbia v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API