Legal Opinion

Township of Conyngham v. Walter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of .Columbia county: Of May Term 1880, No. 124. Scire facias to revive a judgment obtained by Abner K. Walter against the township of Conyngham, on an order issued by said township. The plaintiff, Walter, held a judgment against the township entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia county, to December Term 1873, for $796.72. In January 1879, he issued a scire facias in the usual form to revive said judgment.

Read the full summary

Error to the Court of Common Pleas of .Columbia county: Of May Term 1880, No. 124. Scire facias to revive a judgment obtained by Abner K. Walter against the township of Conyngham, on an order issued by said township. The plaintiff, Walter, held a judgment against the township entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Columbia county, to December Term 1873, for $796.72. In January 1879, he issued a scire facias in the usual form to revive said judgment. To this writ the township pleaded that the plaintiff ought not to have or maintain this scire facias, because the defendant is a certain…

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered

Per, Curiam.

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the

learned iudge of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. O'Neill & Co. v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Betts v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
  4. Shearer v. NaftzingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Gabelia v. Benes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API