Poulicakos v. Poulicakos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.
On the pleadings as they now stand, the ruling of the Presiding Justice is technically correct, for the libelant alleges the requisite period of residence in New Hampshire (R. L., c. 339, s. 6, cl. IX), and where the cause of divorce “consists of a course of conduct continued during a prescribed period of time, as in the case of desertion, or abandonment, it is not material to the jurisdiction, when or where they commence to exist.” Payson v. Payson, 34 N. H. 518, 521.
However, the validity of the Massachusetts decree does not appear to be questioned, nor is there any suggestion that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harding v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodruff v. WoodruffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Rowley v. LampeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Rodrique v. RodriqueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Geers v. GeersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
- deRonde v. deRondeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977