Legal Opinion

Froggatt v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1970No. 6003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

The narrow issue presented for our determination on this appeal is whether the jury that found the appellant-defendant, Edwin Robert Froggatt, guilty of a violation of NRS 453.030 1 (Unlawful Sale of a Narcotic Drug), should have been instructed on the law of entrapment. Under the facts of this record, we have concluded that an instruction on entrapment should have been given; therefore, we reverse the case and remand it to the district court for a new trial.

1. Factual Background.

In January 1969 appellant-defendant Froggatt commenced work as a trainee craps…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Morei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. KummerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. David Anthony HulettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Shrader v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hooper v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API