Froggatt v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
The narrow issue presented for our determination on this appeal is whether the jury that found the appellant-defendant, Edwin Robert Froggatt, guilty of a violation of NRS 453.030 1 (Unlawful Sale of a Narcotic Drug), should have been instructed on the law of entrapment. Under the facts of this record, we have concluded that an instruction on entrapment should have been given; therefore, we reverse the case and remand it to the district court for a new trial.
1. Factual Background.
In January 1969 appellant-defendant Froggatt commenced work as a trainee craps…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Morei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KummerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. David Anthony HulettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Shrader v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Hooper v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.