Legal Opinion
Zena D. Crenshaw v. The Supreme Court of Indiana
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 15, 1999No. 98-2882PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Zena D. Crenshaw, an attorney appearing pro se, brought this action in the district court to challenge Rule 23 of Indiana’s attorney disciplinary rules. She alleged that a subpoena issued to her by the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Indiana (“the Commission”), Indiana’s attorney regulatory agency, violated her constitutional rights. She named as defendants the Supreme Court of Indiana, its five justices in their personal and official capacities, the Commission, and its Executive Secretary and a staff attorney, also in their personal and official…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sergio Moro and Kahuna, Incorporated, an Indiana Corporation v. Shell Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- John L. Taylor v. Western And Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kathleen O'Donnell v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Forty One News, Inc. v. County of LakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Edwards v. Illinois Board of Admissions to the BarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. BransonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Aku v. Chi. Bd. of Educ.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.