Legal Opinion
Sedlacek v. Pearson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1979No. 42330PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The State appeals from a judgment of the District Court vacating an order of the Director of Motor Vehicles revoking the motor vehicle operator’s license and operating privileges of Wesley E. Sedlacek for a period of 6 months. The order was made pursuant to section 39-669.16, R. R. S. 1943, of the implied consent law.
The record shows that at about 11:30 a.m., on October 24, 1977, Sedlacek was stopped for speeding at a point 3 miles south of Madison, Nebraska. The patrolman who stopped Sedlacek administered a preliminary breath test at about 11:45 a.m., which indicated an alcohol blood content…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Calvert v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, MOTOR VEHICLE D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Cavagnaro v. Motor Vehicles Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Larmer v. STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CorradoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Heles v. South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.