Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided August 9, 2005No. 1:04 CV 0399 DFH TABPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Daniel Spencer suffered severe and permanent injuries in an accident caused by an uninsured motorist. Daniel and his wife Faye Spencer have sued Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation and New Hampshire Insurance Company for insurance coverage. The court has diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. All parties have moved for summary judgment.

Spencer suffered his injuries while he was trying to help an injured victim of an accident in which Spencer and the truck he was driving had been involved only moments…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Wagner v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GutierrezIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance v. CutroneDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  4. Henry Swanigan v. Founders Insurance Company and Ronnie Watson (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Michael Yonkman v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API