Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Grote Paint Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. O’Neill Ryan, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, P. J. —

This is an action for unlawful detainer, commenced in a justice’s court and in due course appealed to the circuit court. The evidence is practically the same as in the case of Rogers v. S. E. Grote Paint Company, 118 Mo. App. 300, to recover an installment of rent. The lease contains the following clause not quoted in the case for rent, to-wit:

“It is expressly covenanted between the lessor and the lessee that any failure on the part of the lessee to pay any installments of rent covenanted to be paid by the terms of this lease, for a period of three days after the same shall be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. Grote Paint Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Solomon v. Neisner Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API