Cheshire v. Foam Molding Co.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Rogers, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case, the Commission affirmed and adopted the administrative law judge’s decision that appellant’s claim for additional benefits was barred by the statute of limitations. The only issue in this appeal is whether that determination is correct. We hold that it is, and affirm.
As a result of a pre-hearing conference, the parties agreed to submit the statute of limitations issue to the administrative law judge for decision on the basis of stipulated facts and briefs. It was stipulated that on February 18, 1988, appellant had sustained a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heflin v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- Myles v. Paragould School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blasingame v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Metcalf v. Texarkana School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Kent v. Single Source Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
- Conway Printing Co. v. HigdonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Mary Pennebaker v. Furry Feet Retreat, Inc., and Jeaneen NielCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.