Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fischer v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1896No. Nos. 10,169-(327)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari to review a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county adjudging relator guilty of criminal contempt, entered after hearing before Elliott,'J.

1Per curiam

The relator was convicted of a criminal contempt, not committed in the presence of the court, by the judgment of the district court of Hennepin county, and committed to jail for AO days. The alleged act constituting the contempt was approaching and attempting to influence a juror in reference to his verdict in a cause then on trial. The case comes here on certiorari, and two errors are assigned:

1. That the affidavit which is the basis of the contempt proceedings is defective in substance, in that the facts stated, if true, do not constitute, in law, a contempt of court, for the reason that it…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Webb v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. BinderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Hoefs v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Sandquist v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API