Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Jackson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1949No. Civ. 7457PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

In September or October, 1944, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a part-, nership agreement the purpose of which was to make and sell a device, intended to be installed in ambulances, for producing anesthesia by mechanical refrigeration. At that time the defendant had pending an application for a patent (which issued March 21, 1945) and had spent something like $2,000 upon it, over a period of several years.

The agreement was that the plaintiff, who had certain contacts with government agencies, would devote his entire time to ■developing a market with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Kansas City, St. L. & CR Co. v. Alton R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  3. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. SauppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Hepburn v. AuldSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Dixon v. DixonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. PGI, INC. v. Rathe Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Gorger v. GorgerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Boesky Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Mursor Builders, Inc. v. Crown Mountain Apartment AssociatesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1978
  5. Blizzard v. PenleyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API