Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh S. S. Co. v. Palo
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 13, 1933No. 6115PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
This was an action under the Jones Act, § 33 (46 USCA § 688), to recover for alleged negligent injury to Eugene J. Palo, the-appellee, while he was employed as a seaman in the service Of appellant aboard the bulk freighter Zenith City. Palo alleged two injuries, respectively on or about June 26,1930, and July 30, 1930: Just how the first alleged accident happened does not very clearly appear. Palo testified that he was told to go below to the boiler room and there hook the “pelican hooks” to the rudder chains of the emergency or hand steering gear. These rudder…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Lindgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Johnson v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Rogers v. Tri-State Materials Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1970
- Smith v. LampeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- The TawmieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Calmar SS Corporation v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.