People v. Booker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials, as the statements were made after the intelligent, knowing, and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [1966]), and were not the product of coercion (see People v Cooper, 36 AD3d 828 [2007]; People v Miles, 276 AD2d 566, 567 [2000]). Moreover, there is no merit to the defendant’s claim, made in his supplemental pro se brief, that his statements should have been suppressed because he was…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. LemayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.