Kahn v. Harlan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 175, Oct. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., March T., 1911, No. 1,917, making absolute rule to strike off judgment in case of Harry C. Kahn v. Cora S, Harlan et al. Rule to strike off judgment.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 175, Oct. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., March T., 1911, No. 1,917, making absolute rule to strike off judgment in case of Harry C. Kahn v. Cora S, Harlan et al. Rule to strike off judgment. The judgment entered was as follows: “I hereby appear for Cora S. Harlan, Adam S. Conway, Rena E. Pyewell and Jacob Pyewell, defendants in the above case, and confess judgment against them in accordance with the terms of a certain lease and warrant of attorney, copy of which is hereunto attached, for the amount remaining due and unpaid under the said lease,…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head, J.,
The plaintiff appeals from an order of the learned court below making absolute a rule to strike from the record a judgment in his favor. Our case then lies within a narrow compass. Does the record exhibit any such fatal defect or irregularity as to render the judgment which was stricken off a void and useless thing?
The docket entries seem to show that to No. 1917 of March Term, 1911, of court of common pleas No. 5, a suit was entered by the plaintiff against the several defendants named. They do not disclose the nature of the action nor the fact that any writ issued. On…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Kros v. Bacall Textile Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pacific Lumber Co. v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Home Credit Co. v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Drey St. M. Co. for Use v. NevlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.