Legal Opinion

Chao v. Harold Levinson Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 23, 2005No. 04-0509-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellants Harold Levinson Associates and Edward Bello appeal from a December 31, 2003 judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Charles R. Wolle, J., sitting by designation). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case. On this appeal, defendant-appellants Harold Levinson Associates and Edward Bello raise two issues previously decided by the district court and this Court. See Harold Levinson Assocs., Inc. v. Chao, 37 Fed.Appx. 19 (2d Cir.2002); Herman v. Harold Levinson Assocs.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Harold Levinson Associates, Inc. v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Furlong v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API