Legal Opinion

Dong Ying Fun v. Nagle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1925No. 4438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The contention that applicant was not given a fair and impartial hearing, and that the proceedings leading to his exclusion were arbitrary and illegal, is based upon the grounds: (1) That the board of special inquiry was improperly constituted, in that it was made up of members who acted in the dual capacity of members of the board as well as stenographers to the board; (2) and that the members of the board were so changed during the hearing that no two of them heard the testimony adduced in petitioner’s behalf.

The fact that one of the members of the board…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tang Tun v. EdsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Morrell v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louie Lung Gooey v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States Ex Rel. Minuto v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Hom Moon Ong v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. United States ex rel. Chin Cheung Nai v. CorsiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. Yee Chun v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API