Legal Opinion

Hom Moon Ong v. Nagle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1929No. 5593PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, claiming to he a foreign-born eitizen of the United States, was denied admission on his application to enter the United States on a hearing before a board of special inquiry. Upon the dismissal of his appeal to the Secretary of Labor, he filed in the court below his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. That court, without issuing an order to show cause, denied the writ. The petition alleged that the petitioner was denied a full and fair hearing by the members of the board of special inquiry, in that said members were so shifted around and substituted one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pearson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Quon Quon Poy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. White v. Chan Wy SheungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  4. Jew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  5. Moy Said Ching v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Louie Lung Gooey v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States Ex Rel. Minuto v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. United States ex rel. Chin Cheung Nai v. CorsiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. Yee Chun v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API