Legal Opinion
Kim v. McAleenan
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 3, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01212Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U.S. Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01212-SKC YEON SIK KIM Plaintiff, v. KEVIN MCALEENAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REMAND [#12] This Order addresses Defendants’ Motion to Remand to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for Decision (“Motion”). [#12.]1 Plaintiff filed a Response [#23], which was followed by Defendants’ Reply [#24.] The Court has reviewed the Motion, the related briefing, and the relevant law. No hearing is necessary. For the following reasons, the Motion is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Ajlani v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.