Legal Opinion

Fussell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1986No. 84-706PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Following a nonjury trial, appellant was convicted of taking property without right in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3816 (1985 Supp.). On appeal, he claims that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We agree and reverse.

The government’s evidence at trial showed that appellant approached Officer Anthony Tisdale, a member of the casual clothes section of the Metro Transit Police, and asked him if he would like to purchase a Metro flash pass. 1 Appellant represented that the pass was good for bus transportation and that it was worth twenty dollars, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RollingNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Saunders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. SeligmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. State v. DurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tibbs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Jeffcoat v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Baggett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API