Legal Opinion
Saunders v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1974No. 7252PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Associate Judge:
Charged in a one-count indictment with grand larceny 1 appellant was, after a jury trial, found guilty. The sole issue on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found that the value of the articles which were the subject of the larceny was $100 or more.
We are unable to determine from the record brought here whether the sufficiency of the evidence as to value of the articles involved was challenged by a motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s case. Cf. Crawford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 156,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- People v. IrrizariNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Maisel v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kenhan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Childress v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Whalen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Malloy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Zellers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.