Legal Opinion
State v. Rodriguez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 2010No. AC 30766PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The defendant, Jeffrey Rodriguez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, pursuant to a conditional plea of nolo contendere, 1 to the charges of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b) and possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to suppress. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court reasonably could have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. SantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. MannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McCormackConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. HoughtalingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. PetersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010