Legal Opinion
State v. Mann
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 5, 2004No. SC 16996PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
After a trial to the court, the defendant, Jason Mann, was convicted of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependant in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b), possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), and possession of a controlled substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (c). The trial court rendered judgment sentencing the defendant to a total effective term of seventeen years imprisonment, suspended after twelve years,…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. PierreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. AvilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Echavarria v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.