Loud v. The Doris Eckhoff
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Admiralty. Appeal from a decree of the circuit court of the United States* for the southern district of New York, affirming pro forma a decree of the district court for said district, which held in fault both tugs and both tows for the collision described in the opinion. 32 Fed. Rep. 555. And see 41 Fed. Rep. 156. Both tows appealed to this court, the tugs not appealing.
1Opinion of the Court
LaCojíbe, Circuit Judge.
On the morning of March 8, 1886, about 10 o’clock, a collision occurred between the bark Doris Eckhoff, in tow of the tug R. S. Carter, and the schooner 0. R. Flint, in tow of the tug John G-. Stevens. The damage to the Flint and cargo was about $12,000 to $13,000; to the Eckhoff, about $300. The Flint brought action against the hark and both tugs. The tugs were not attached, on account of their leaving the jurisdiction, and the marshal only seized the bark. On petition of the owners of the bark, the owners of the tugs Sherman and Hughes were made respondents, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The "Margaret."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- The Clarita and the ClaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cushing v. Owners of the Ship John FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- P. Dougherty Co. v. United States. P. Dougherty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- The TeaserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Vessel Owners' Towing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
- The ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.