Legal Opinion

People v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain, and we reject his contention that the bargained-for sentence is unduly harsh or severe. The further contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to interview witnesses concerns matters outside the record and is therefore properly addressed in a CPL 440.10 motion (see, People v Snitzel, 270 AD2d 836, lv denied 95 NY2d 804; People v Chiera, 255 AD2d 685, 686). (Appeal from Judgment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ChieraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. SnitzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HINES, TERRANCE B., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. KING, JERRED, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API