MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Never before have we imposed the sanction of depriving a primary candidate of an election victory absent a showing of that candidate’s responsibility for the fraud or misconduct, nor does the record in this case warrant the imposition of such a sanction. Petitioner failed to present evidence sufficient to establish irregularities or misconduct under either the rule of Matter of De Martini v Power (27 NY2d 149) and Matter of Ippolito v Power (22 NY2d 594) or Matter of Lowenstein v Larkin (40 AD2d 604, affd 31 NY2d 654). Indeed, the Appellate Division acknowl*954edged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ippolito v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- MATTER OF DE MARTINI v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Lowenstein v. LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Lowenstein v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conroy v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Schreiber v. GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Swanson v. SunderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- MATTER OF BEATTY v. OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1982