Legal Opinion

MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Never before have we imposed the sanction of depriving a primary candidate of an election victory absent a showing of that candidate’s responsibility for the fraud or misconduct, nor does the record in this case warrant the imposition of such a sanction. Petitioner failed to present evidence sufficient to establish irregularities or misconduct under either the rule of Matter of De Martini v Power (27 NY2d 149) and Matter of Ippolito v Power (22 NY2d 594) or Matter of Lowenstein v Larkin (40 AD2d 604, affd 31 NY2d 654). Indeed, the Appellate Division acknowl*954edged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ippolito v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. MATTER OF DE MARTINI v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Lowenstein v. LarkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Lowenstein v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conroy v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Schreiber v. GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Swanson v. SunderlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. MATTER OF BEATTY v. OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API