Legal Opinion

United States v. Nicholas Sten

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 8, 1965No. 205, Docket 27299PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Sten was tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, before Judge Murphy sitting without a jury, and was convicted of having participated in the sale of stolen furs in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2315 and 2. The facts regarding the theft and disposal of the furs are set forth in United States v. Cardillo, 316 F.2d 606, 609-610 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 822, 857, 84 S.Ct. 60, 11 L.Ed.2d 55 (1963), an appeal by six codefendants, and need not be repeated here. Sten’s appeal was not considered with the other appeals…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Benjamin IndiviglioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Vankirk Moore and Harold BurnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Ohio Valley Electric Corp. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API