Legal Opinion
United States v. Darby
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1933No. 653PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
The case involves the construction of a statute of the United States which makes it a crime for an officer or employee of a federal reserve bank, or of any member bank, to make any entry in its books with intent to defraud. R.S. § 5209 as amended by the Act of Septem ber 26, 1918, c. 177, § 7, 40 Stat. 972; 12 U.S: Code, § 592.
An indictment in sixteen counts charges the appellee, John G. Darby, with a violation of this statute. Eight entries are alleged to have been falsely made. Each has relation to a separate promissory note discounted by the Montgomery County National Bank of Rockville,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. CorbettSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Peters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Simon Edward Heath and Paul Sau-Ki ChengCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Fred De La MataCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.