Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 2000No. COA99-976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant was tried on proper bills of indictment charging him with first degree kidnapping, attempted first degree rape, two counts of first degree sex offense and robbery with a dangerous weapon. Prior to trial, defendant moved to suppress certain written and oral statements which he made to law enforcement officers. The trial court conducted a voir dire hearing and, after making oral and written findings of fact and conclusions of law, denied the motion to suppress.

Briefly summarized, the State’s evidence at trial tended to show that at approximately 5:00 a.m. on 10 October…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. BonneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. State v. FrinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. AutryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. WatlingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API