State v. Frink
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRIA, Judge.
Carlos Maurice Frink (“defendant”) appeals judgments entered 7 March 2001 by Judge William C. Gore, Jr. (“Judge Gore”) in Cumberland County Superior Court. Defendant asserts Judge Gore improperly admitted evidence of a codefendant’s sentencing condition, and erred in permitting certain remarks by the prosecutor in closing argument. We find no prejudicial error.
The State’s evidence tended to show the following facts. Defendant was a member of a gang known as the Crips. Tameika Douglas (“Douglas”), another gang member, testified for the State. On 17 August 1998, the gang decided…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FoustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Penalver, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Penalver, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.