Legal Opinion

State v. Frink

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2003No. COA02-570PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

Carlos Maurice Frink (“defendant”) appeals judgments entered 7 March 2001 by Judge William C. Gore, Jr. (“Judge Gore”) in Cumberland County Superior Court. Defendant asserts Judge Gore improperly admitted evidence of a codefendant’s sentencing condition, and erred in permitting certain remarks by the prosecutor in closing argument. We find no prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence tended to show the following facts. Defendant was a member of a gang known as the Crips. Tameika Douglas (“Douglas”), another gang member, testified for the State. On 17 August 1998, the gang decided…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FoustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Penalver, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  3. Living Centers of Texas, Inc. v. Penalver, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006
  4. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API