Legal Opinion

Baron v. Frederickson

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 14, 2006No. 05-C-500-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

In this civil action for monetary relief, plaintiffs Thomas Baron, Mary Lou Baron and Pondview of Pardeeville, LLC contend that defendants Katie Frederickson and Village of Pardeeville violated plaintiffs’ rights under state law and under the Fourteenth Amendment by interfering with their ability to complete a residential property development. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

According to plaintiffs, before they began their land development project, defendant Frederickson and her family had access to a pond located on plaintiffs’ property.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. BACK DOCTORS, LTD.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Cynthia S. Holmes, P.C. v. Back Doctors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. C. Pepper Logistics, LLC v. Lanter Delivery Systems, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API