Legal Opinion
Novak v. MacKintosh
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 17, 1996No. CIV 95-4051PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PIERSOL, District Judge.
This matter was tried to the Court without a jury on February 14, 1996; February 29, 1996; and April 19, 1996. Plaintiff, Rita Novak, brought suit against Donald P. Mackintosh and Dakota Industries, Inc., for violations of the Veterans’ Reemployment Rights Act [‘VRRA”], 38 U.S.C. §§ 2021 et seq., seeking back pay, benefits, and prejudgment interest. In accordance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court enters its findings of fact and conclusions of law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff, Rita Novak [“Novak”],…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- James M. Cronin v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rogers v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Alvern C. Weed v. Social Security Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
- Alvern C. Weed v. Social Security Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board2016
- Rogers v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004