Legal Opinion

Morford v. Brown

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1963No. 9100PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This is a tort action whereby appellant seeks damage on account of his personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. Appellant, in his complaint, alleged respondents’ joint, concurrent and consecutive acts of negligence, as causative of the collision, injuries and damage.

Respondents Selma Brown, and Joan N. Brown (sometimes in the record referred to as Sloper), in their amended answer, denied the allegations of negligence and alleged the affirmative defenses of appellant’s contributory negligence, and unavoidably of the accident. While the trial court’s pretrial order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hooton v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Lallatin Ex Rel. Lallatin v. TerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Paul E. Hasselbrink and Eva G. Hasselbrink v. George SpeelmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. Hartley v. BohrerIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McLean v. City of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hackworth v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Schaub v. LinehanIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Killinger v. IestIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API