Legal Opinion

Matter of Excise Tax Protest of Arkla, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1996No. 85309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

919 P.2d 1151 (1996)

In the Matter of the GROSS PRODUCTION AND PETROLEUM EXCISE TAX PROTEST OF ARKLA, INC. Regarding the Settlement Payment made to Marathon Oil Company,

NORAM ENERGY CORPORATION, formerly Arkla, Inc., Appellant,

v.

OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 85309.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

January 30, 1996.

Kenneth L. Hunt, J. Kevin Hayes, Tulsa, for Appellant.

Gregory K. Frizzell, Kathryn Bass, Oklahoma City, for Appellee.

Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Appellant, Noram Energy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Kimery v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. American Oil Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Enterprise Management Consultants, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Dow Jones & Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neer v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Bruner v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API