Legal Opinion

McNabb v. Lynn Et Ux

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Is a motion for a new trial necessary when the case is heard in the trial court on stipulated facts'?

Following an automobile intersection cross-road collision, in which A. A. McNabb was fatally injured, his wife brought suit in Wilson county for damages against U. L. Lynn and his wife. The accident occurred in Wilson county and plaintiff resides in that county. The defendants reside in Putnam county. Summons issued and the declaration was filed December 9,1935. The declaration showed that Mrs. Lynn was driving the car at the time of the collision, her husband sitting beside her. Defendant U.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. ColvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Johnson v. Martin Furniture Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Anderson v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Memphis v. Sherwood Building Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bryant v. Central Motor Express, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Cheek v. Marshall County Quarterly CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. City of Memphis v. Sherwood Building CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API