Williams v. Eaze Solutions, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FARRAH WILLIAMS, Case No. 3:18-cv-02598-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE ARBITRATION v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 17 10 EAZE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. 11 12 13 In this putative class action, plaintiff Farrah Williams alleges that defendant Eaze Solutions 14 violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, by sending her 15 unsolicited, autodialed text messages. Eaze seeks to compel arbitration of her claims pursuant to 16 its terms of service. Dkt. No. 17. While the case raises interesting issues about 17…