Legal Opinion
Di Silvestro v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1960No. Civ. 20188PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYFIEL, District Judge.
These are cross-motions. The defendant moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and the plaintiff cross-moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12.
The complaint herein is entitled “Complaint For Negligence Under The Federal Tort Claims Act” and contains five causes of, action. Each cause of action is based on Section 1346(b) of Title 28, United States Code, and the complaint demands damages in the aggregate sum of $2,000,-000.
This is the latest in a series of actions commenced by this plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union Oil Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Di Silvestro v. United States Veterans' AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
- Carlson v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Di Silvestro v. United States Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- DiSilvestro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Gonzalez v. LeonardDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Steinmasel v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1962
- Smith v. DiCaraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Di Silvestro v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.