Steinmasel v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MICKELSON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff is a veteran of the Armed Forces, and in this action is asserting against the United States a claim for damages for loss of educational benefits under Title 38 U.S.C.A. The United States has filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C.A. § 211(a) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 2680(h). For the purposes of this motion, the facts stated in the complaint must be accepted as true.
In July, 1960, after plaintiff’s discharge from the Armed Forces, but prior to his “delimiting date” (the date of the expiration of the time limit within…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Van Horne v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Hahn v. Gray, Jr., Administrator of Veterans' AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- De Rodulfa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Clyde Fitch and Sharon Fitch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Rickman v. RickmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Diaz Castro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.